“I garden with two main motivations: to encourage wildlife and to grow edibles.”
You will all hate me for this, but this appeared on my screen and my heart plummeted. Do I really need to explain?
Well, I suppose the first thing is that I hate horrible language and here you have one of the worst examples. What on earth does anyone mean by ‘encouraging wildlife’? My picture of ‘encouraging’ is playing aeroplanes with food to persuade a toddler to eat a spoonful. Or yelling for a football team? So how on earth do you ‘encourage wildlife?’
Sort of – “come on, little slug, you know you can reach that lettuce if you really try”? Or “Yes, Bambi, you’ll get over that fence: just one more leap!”
‘Wildlife’ is of course an odd term in itself, encompassing rats and locusts as well as cuddly things.
Badgers are usually seen as cuddly, hedgehogs as sweet. There is much dispute in the UK about how many hedgehogs are eaten by badgers – the latter being a protected species:
“The habitats that badgers and hedgehogs inhabit in the UK overlap greatly. They also share very similar diets and foraging grounds, with both species maximising their consumption of prey items like earthworms. Badgers are also what are called ‘intraguild predators’, meaning that they not only compete for a lot of the same prey as hedgehogs, but can also hunt hedgehogs themselves when other food is scarce.
Although species such as foxes and domesticated pets are known to attempt to eat hedgehogs, badgers are the main predator of hedgehogs in Great Britain. This is because they are the only species believed to be able to manoeuvre and prise open hedgehogs when they roll into a defence curl.”
Clever! (But – I thought that we need those earthworms??)
It’s also disputed just how much damage grey squirrels do to our bird population
and whether it may even be a good thing. Though I wonder how happy birds feel when their babies vanish and “the survival rate of those remaining often goes up, as they have less competition for food in the nest.” If this is good for birds, maybe our ‘encouragement’ should involve going round robbing birds’ nests?
Let’s face it – cuddly wildlife needs to eat something and it’s going to be some other kind of wildlife.
Hm, Charles points out that there is vegetarian wildlife. And maybe people who garden for wildlife don’t much like the insects or plants which wildlife consume. I’ve often wondered if carrots mind being yanked up and eaten, but that belongs in the ‘growing edibles’ framework.
And grey squirrels definitely kill trees. So do rabbits. I can vouch for that myself.
Mice and voles are quite cuddly looking –
but some people remove leaves from their borders in case they provide shelter for this sort of wildlife. And sometimes voles eat slugs. (But we like slugs now?)
So if wildlife consumes and damages wildlife, by its very nature and inevitably, which special wildlife do we garden for?? I love and feed birds, especially the beautiful long tailed tit, which even squirrel lovers think may get scoffed by squirrels.
You may, if you are terribly anti humans, think deer are helpful and worth encouragement, since accidents with them possibly kill twenty people a year in Britain. Wild boar may be helping those figures. How to ‘encourage’ them? Take your fences down? Dunno – they seem to wander into people’s gardens without any encouragement.
Well, we love bees don’t we? They are pollinators and we know that some people garden totally for their benefit. Though we do know that honey bees in the UK can have a detrimental effect on wild pollinator species, including bumblebees. And some of those are parasitic in ways you may not want to know about, on other bees. Which ones should you encourage??
If you are so minded you can read all about the most horrible parasites here, and decide if you’d like to encourage them. There are wasps with the same kind of horrid habit too. I read this recently: “We introduce the good predators, such as microscopic wasps, 2mm across, which kill the aphids by injecting their babies into the back end of an aphid for them to burst out, like the film Alien.” Tough on the aphids, which are a bit wild too. But we do know how to encourage wasps – have a picnic.
We used to have a lot of frogs but then not so much.
And one day Charles watched a newt eating frogspawn and it all made sense. He tried to save the frogspawn by building a kind of cage in the pool but it just made a good place to see the newts having supper.
Don’t get me wrong – I’m happy to share my garden with most of this stuff. All these creatures think it’s their home and I think it’s mine, so sometimes we fight a bit. But we all rub along apart from those fenced out. It’s just life.
As for the food growing – well, it doesn’t interest me but I understand how worthy it is and how important to a great many gardeners. I do think that it makes the rubbing along with wildlife a bit harder, though, as it provides feasts for wildlife as well as humans.
I suppose it would be hard to explain to someone who only gardens for veggies and wildlife that my principal motivation for making a garden is to create and enjoy beauty and excitement. (Though not so much the excitement of newt feasts)
You in love with wildlife gardening??
PS – news from UK:
“Squirrels are causing chaos at a London housing estate by using scaffolding to climb into people’s homes and steal their food.
Residents at Sumner Buildings in Southwark, central London, said the brazen rodents have the run of the estate since building work was carried out.”
At the end of the day, it seems as if Mother Nature just wants to be left the hell alone. Because most every helpful thing we do, backfires. Kudzu? Roundup? Imported honeybees? Inadvertently-imported fireants? GMO plants? Factory farms? Plenty of room for differing opinions, but mostly, we make things worse.
You have a point. And we deserve a little ‘leaving alone’ too!
Well put, Laura, Well put! However, I HAVE discovered a non poisonous weed killer tho.. white vinegar! It took me til I hit 76 to figure it out! I just kept pulling the weeds.. as I hate poison.
oh Miss Cantankerous Anne. I always enjoy your demented perspective on life. Keep it up.
Doesn’t everyone sometimes get oppressed by relentless garden garbage?
Your comments are hilarious! I definitely agree with you – WHICH wildlife do we “encourage”? We have a 5 ft. fence around our veggie beds now – had to, the deer thought it was a private buffet. Slugs? Salt ’em, I say! Voles? They LOVE squash, especially if the vines wander all over and provide cover. So it’s a balancing act just as it is in the non-garden parts of the land. Some eat, some get eaten, even Bambi. I’m sure I’ll get shot down for that comment but it’s true. Keep on gardening for beauty and “excitement” and keep writing about it, I love it.
Thanks!!!!
An excellent rant. Do keep ranting on!
Thanks, Pat!
Excellent rant! Recently in the USA wildlife habitat protection has been addressed by the Public Health Community.
The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security:
The viruses that cause COVID-19, SARS, Nipah, Hendra, and possibly Ebola have all spilled over from bats to humans, sometimes through an intermediate host. When animal populations are stressed, they are more likely to shed viruses. To prevent such stress, the study says efforts should be made to:
Ensure adequate food and safe havens for wildlife, especially during migration and reproduction
Protect areas where animals roost or aggregate to prevent populations from splintering
Maintain buffer zones between human settlements and wildlife habitats
Provide local communities with the protection and education they need to safely coexist with wildlife
These and other mitigation efforts are part of a One Health collaborative approach to preventing viral spillover, which is defined in the draft pandemic agreement currently being negotiated at the WHO as “an integrated, unifying approach that aims to sustainably balance and optimize the health of people, animals, and ecosystems. It recognizes that the health of humans, domestic and wild animals, plants, and the wider environment (including ecosystems) is closely linked and interdependent.”
This policy is still in the early stages of development early but adds a new dimension to this discussion.
That sounds worthy – does nothing of its like already exist? But do we have no fears that there may be aspects with unforeseen and not entirely delightful consequences?
World wide many agricultural agencies monitor the presence and spread of viral pathogens among animals particularly livestock. In the USA the Centers for Disease Control and Agriculture Department take lead rolls for zoonotic transmission (animal to animal / human). Avian influenza among livestock is an example. Viral zoonotic infection is under intense research owing to recent public health crises. I haven’t seen much policy research connecting public health and zoonotic pathogens with habitat preservation or conservation. It’s not in my area of expertise and I’m unfamiliar with agency policy in this regards. However It bears watching that both local and federal governments as well as other groups with similar concerns may propose legislation protecting habitats on the basis of public health as well as ecology. It is an interesting debate.
The following article caught my interest in this subject as well as your ever delightful rant:
Plowright, R.K., Ahmed, A.N., Coulson, T. et al. Ecological countermeasures to prevent pathogen spillover and subsequent pandemics. Nat Commun 15, 2577 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-46151-9
John
Thanks for that!
As for the squirrels.. they are so clever and cute.. altho I have a friend who calls them ” rats with furry tails”.. They love to dig up my flower pots in the spring looking for forgotten nuts they buried last fall.. I sprinkle red pepper flakes but this year even those don’t work.. Perhaps my red pepper is old? Had to put a huge tent net over the pond to protect the fish/koi. Seems to help. Also put more of the heavy fake logs in the pond for hiding places as the fish are getting bigger. We can’t control everything.. Just hoping to protect some of the creatures I love. I also stopped putting food in bird feeders as the hawks were sitting watching for hungry birds. I now put food for birds in under the killer holly tree and in hidden spots hard for large predator birds to reach. So far..
Who knows what tiny and important creatures were being destroyed by your pepper flakes?? And why might we wish to deprive the hawks of their supper?
It’s impossible!
I’m at war with our vegetarian, rodent groundhogs, unrelated to your hedgehog. Groundhogs like to file down their sharp teeth on our barn posts. I have terrible aim and seldom hit them with a shotgun, but a friend who is the Secretary of the Working Terrier’s Association, comes around once a year with her Jack Russells who love to go deep into the groundhog tunnels. Her dogs have radio collars, so she can locate them and dig them out if they get hung up on roots. The dogs have helped. The barn is still standing. Otherwise, the raccoons have free rein on ripe pawpaws and always leave a neat pile of fresh seeds as an insult, once the delicious pulp is eaten. Racoons also have a divining rod for fresh tomatoes. It annoys be to no end that they only take out one small bite. I tried sprinkling hot chili pepper on the ripening tomatoes, but the fight is fruitless. I’m reading a good book called the Rambunctious Garden. Our patch is a poster child for rambunctious.
Exhausting.
The editors of Outwitting Squirrels forbade all mention of guns…….
But the world would have us believe that we must love all this wildlife, except our own…
Mungo killed a nest of rabbits today that I didn’t know was there (placed right in the middle of the main serpentine bed!). I didn’t see him do it either, just came on the remains of the nest and a very fat little dog. It was a pioneer bunny I believe – we have watched them grow closer to our driveway, but never on the property. And I have been worried. After groundhogs, voles, moles and deer, rabbits would kill me. Good little Mungo. He sorted the groundhog issue years ago. And there are acres and acres and acres for them to inhabit, so I don’t feel bad about it. After all, he is no different than a coyote – and we have many of those. – MW
Can you bring him on your next visit here? We have one rabbit that has taken up residence, been here a year now, I think, and we would be grateful to see the back of him. Or her. Especially if it’s a her, given others might yet get in!
This is a quite immature and petty rant. Check out Sarah Raven’s new podcast about making areas conducive to wildlife again. Water, fungi, life, worms, wood, organic material all contribute to a wildlife-friendly landscape. Your rant is really silly.
Hi, AB, it’s quite reassuring to be immature at my age.
I’m fortunate enough to be surrounded by water, fungi, life, worms, wood, organic material and a garden full of a myriad of life forms all knocking along together. You may not be aware that in the UK you cannot wake in the morning without being inundated with podcasts, posts, blog, newspaper reports, worthy organisations and all broadcast media telling you how to be a good person, contributing to a wildlife friendly landscape and saving the planet as you do.
I appreciate that I am a heretic as well as petty and silly. But sometimes that’s an enormous relief.
AB, don’t call anyone’s rant “silly” unless you cover the mirrors first.
Love that!
This is an old debate. I recall Muir’s view of preservation which included removal of First Nation /Indigenous peoples and Gifford Pinchot’s more moderate ideas on conservation which led to some major problems. Thank you Anne for injecting humor into this debate which at times can be very divisive.
It is in the UK too, back before we were being frightened by an imminent ice age.
Loved it! I wish more garden writing focused on pleasure and beauty. It seems like you almost need to earn your worthiness badge before you can talk about gardening these days.
This is true – disapproval waits round every bend in the path.
I agree with you both. I just go back in time and read Elizabeth Lawrence and Joe Eck and Louise Beebe Wilder. There is a lot of Groupthink going on in some gardening circles I think. And naivete. Awful jargon too, used perhaps to beat neophytes into submission.
Anne, I think you’re pointing out an uncomfortable fact: that people want rules and platitudes as a substitution for thinking.
It makes us feel good to repeat things like “[XYZ thing] encourages wildlife” but it’s rather uncomfortable to really deeply think about our biases regarding the natural world and how that impacts what we do/don’t do in our gardens. It’s also difficult to find and comprehend what little empirical data there is on these subjects. It’s even harder to synthesize these things and come up with a concrete action plan and implement it in our own gardens. So much work, when spewing nonsense like “No Mow May” is so very, very easy!
However, all this being difficult is not a good reason to give up. An easy-enough option is to simply acknowledge that our collective understanding of nature is still rather shallow, and proceed with a spirit of curiosity and humility. We can experiment in our own gardens with pro-wildlife practices that also make for good gardens, and we can avoid things we undoubtedly know are harmful, like using pesticides/herbicides. Alongside all this, we can continue to support the work of people doing deep research and study, like Doug Tallamy’s work on the importance of oak trees.
That’s wisdom and I’m grateful for it.
Apart from a small proviso re herbicides and insecticides. The same caution applies to whether judicious use of some well tested ‘chemicals’ (hey, water is a ‘chemical’…..) may be better than the random, untested use of household stuff which you will commonly find recommended all over the place as an alternative. I’d put that as another complex insoluble.
If the “wildlife” doesn’t bother my plants too much, I won’t bother them. I want beauty as sensed by my eyes, ears, and nose. When the lily beetles invaded, I tried to be gentle by picking them off and washing the leaves.. they overwhelmed me, and I had to pull up and throw away all my lilies (100+) I have no sympathy for the wildlife, but I try to grow things they don’t particularly crave (and enough of it that I won’t miss a few) so we can live in harmony. Is that pragmatism or laziness?
Hm, lily beetle – I hope Charles will do his contentious squishing again this year, but the result is more and more plants that the lily beetle like…. Though not yet over a hundred.
I’m not sure we should label our efforts and compromises at all. Though I possibly just did…….
Hilarious, Anne! Thank you for that! I was innocently sitting here, barely awake in the airport at 6::30am, and decided to catch up on my rants. I’m afraid you made me disturb another barely awake traveler when I got to the part about attracting wasps. Laughed out loud. And that, followed by the newt dinner table woke me right up. What a pleasant way to start the day!
Happy to have helped – you, if not your fellow traveller!
I know I’m coming late to comment, as this was March, and now it’s June. I just wonder if you, Anne, could identify the author of “I garden with two main motivations…etc.” Siting the origin of this statement and any subsequent discourse regarding such, may help balance any criticism going forward. I’m at a loss to comment on a one sided affair. Nevertheless, I feel your response is totally justified.